Welcome

The Bible is the Infinite Existence’s self-disclosure about how Famous He is really is as He shines this beauty centrally through His Son Jesus Christ on the cross.

My life verse is Isaiah 66:19


RSS FEED

  .

   rss_feed_cup

 

 

 

 

Buy Books at my

Store: 

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

   


facebook-icon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twitter / OsheaDavis
Twitter updates from Oshea Davis / OsheaDavis.
Home
FOR HIS SUFFERINGS, GOD PROMISED CHRIST THE REWARD OF SEEING SINNERS SAVED
Written by Oshea Davis   
Saturday, 21 January 2012

 

Headnote to Is. 53:10(a) [pending]

Jonathan Edwards sketched out this sermon, dated around Aug. 1731-Dec. 1732.

Edwards identifies Is. 53:10 with the Father pronouncing that Christ’s suffering will be successful, and to which he shall give Christ the reward of seeing his beloved church converted and brought to him.

Edwards penned this Christocentric sermon within the frame work of the Covenant of Redemption. The Christology focuses on one of the inward motivations for Christ’s sufferings. “Christ has so set his love upon men, that the seeing this sight [of men saved] is what he earnestly desired and greatly delights in.”

Some points of interest are found when J.E. mentions Luke 22:29, “I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me,” along with other verses to show that Christ was subject to God as mediator for he first volunteered so in the covenant of redemption.  Edwards also mentions this verse in miscellanies 1064 to show that Christ also entered into a Covenant of Grace with the church writing, “the parties contracting in the covenant of redemption are the Father and the Son, but the parties contracting in the covenant of grace, Christ and believers, is what seems to be taught in that Luke 22:29, "καγω διατιθεμαι υμιν καθως διεθετο μοι ο πατηρ μου βασιλειαν, I do by covenant dispose unto you a kingdom, as my father by covenant disposed unto me." For the word διατιθεμαι properly signifies to covenant, or make a contract or testament, or to appoint or dispose by covenant or testament. This is the word used, Acts 3.25, "Ye are the children of the prophets and of the covenant which God made (διαθησομαι) with our fathers." So Hebrews 8:10, "This is the covenant I will make (διαθησομαι) with the house of Israel." Therefore, the noun διαθηκη that comes of this verb signifies covenant, which is the word translated "covenant" in the New Testament.”

Furthermore, from the framework of the Trinity in miscellanies 1062[I]  Edwards also speaks how the father not only is a judge of Christ in their covenant but likewise a giver of rewards. He writes, “the whole tenor of the gospel holds this forth: that the Son acts altogether freely, and as in his own right, in undertaking the great and difficult and self-abasing work of our redemption, and that he becomes obliged to the Father with respect to it by voluntary covenant engagements, and not by any establishment prior thereto; so that he merits infinitely of the Father in entering into and fulfilling these engagements. …From which engagements of the Son the Father acquires a new right of headship and authority over the Son, to command him and prescribe to him and rule over him as his proper lawgiver and judge; and the Father also comes under new obligation to the Son, to give him such success, rewards, etc.”

In Doctrine Edwards explains two propositions. The first being that “God the Father promised Jesus Christ a reward, if he would undertake to suffer for us,” and J.E. expounds on this through a rising succession of questions and answers regarding the covenant of redemption.  The second proposition laid forth is, “this is a part {of the reward that God promised him for his sufferings}," and here J.E. explores this with a second set of rising set of questions and answers centering on Christ’s love for the persons he died for so that it is his love for them that having them is the reward. Staying on this theme of Christ’s love for the elect J.E. ends the doctrine with the escalating encouragement that “Christ doth as it were adorn himself with believers, as the high priest was adorned with the precious stones.”

In Application we are encouraged with several meditative and earnest responses for unbelievers and believers, crescendoing with a special plea for believers to rejoice with Christ when sinners are converted since they are united to him, for “it should rejoice our hearts: for Christ herein has his rewards for his suffering.”

 

*  *  *  *  *

 

logo

 

 

 

Transcribed, edited & Headnote provided by:

Jonathan Edwards Center @ Yale University (http://edwards.yale.edu/),

Kenneth Minkema,

Oshea Davis.  2012

 

For permission use see the Jonathan Edwards Center website:  http://edwards.yale.edu/copyright


Read more...
 
God Decrees: (Updated) 2012
Written by Oshea Davis   
Wednesday, 25 January 2012

God Decrees: (Updated) 2012
   
   

       In my book, The Divine Decrees, I have to confess that I did not distinguish—as well as I ought—the distinction between the historical and purpose order of the decrees. As a writer it is easy to make the mistake of assuming my audience sees categories that my mind’s eye does. Thus, I wish to come out this is modified version with the emphasis on this distinction


Defining the terms:
        With the assumption that most who have interest in this biblical doctrine will know the terms supralapsarian and infralapsarian, and so I will move on.  The lack of this distinction of purpose and historical has caused more than a small amount of confusion.  Let us remedy this.  In fact, the argument of supra. vs. infra. is more about incompleteness than out right error.


        When God’s decrees are laid out from Top to bottom or that is, when they are laid out from the perspective of what God chose as His goals first, then we call this the, “Purpose perspective.”  This is what some know as supralapsarian.
       When God’s decrees are laid out from the Bottom up or that is, when they are penned down from the perspective of executing His goals we call this, “historical perspective.”   This is what some know as infralapsarian.
   

Read more...
 
Reverse Engineering the Gospel for good Biblical Hermeneutics
Written by Oshea Davis   
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
  I have written a book called, The Divine Decrees, and in this book I dive into the showing that what God originally intended first, in His decrees, is last in execution and what was the last comes first in order.

For example take that of a business man.  When this now president of the company first began his journey in the working world he did not start as president but at the bottom of the corporate ladder.  Although he started at the bottom of the corporate ladder yet this was not his original goal or intention; rather, being president was.  See, what he originally intended was accomplished last in order, while starting at the bottom, which was intended after his goal of president was chosen, was accomplished first in order.  Ecclesiastes 7:8, “The end of a thing is better than its beginning.”

And so God who is infinite in wisdom has His end goal as His original intention, but starts out with something different, and continues to take a series of steps until His original goal is accomplished.  This original goal is the public illuminary and supremacy of Jesus Christ, and that the pinnacle instrument to accomplish this is a public, redeemed bride married to His Son enthralled with eternal joy and praises of Him.

Read more...
 

Syndicate

All scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Joomla Template design by RocketTheme